Achieve More At Less Cost: Local Governments Can Rate Drainage System Capacity Without Need for Expensive Modelling of Every Pipe
Note to Reader:
Federal funding support provided through Natural Resources Canada’s Regional Adaptation Collaborative Program made it possible to develop the Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool as an add-on to the Water Balance Model (WBM) decision support tool.
The Screening Tool is actually stand-alone from the WBM because it addresses a different evaluation need on the part of local governments. The WBM is used for green infrastructure evaluation whereas the Screening Tool is applied to drainage conveyance systems.
Framework for Screening and Decision-Making
Many drainage conveyance systems operate without serious problems for many years. Yet many engineering studies recommend plans for pipe replacement and upsizing that would cost tens of millions of dollars, money that local governments do not have. Reliance on complex computer models and inflexible application of design standards may be having an unintended consequence.
Ask Four Questions
To help local governments make informed decisions AND achieve more at less cost, the Water Balance Model Partnership has developed a web-based Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool. This enables local governments to undertake drainage system capacity analysis without the need for intensive and expensive modelling of the storm sewer system. Four questions provide a framework for screening and decision-making:
What is the existing level of drainage service within the community?
What will be the effect of climate change?
What will be the effect of redevelopment?
What will be the effect of climate change on redevelopment?
A guiding principle is to provide an equal Level-of-Service or access to the drainage system for all properties within a drainage catchment or watershed.
Focus on What is Most Important
A Level-of-Service (LOS) Methodology is embedded in the Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool. This provides the means to quickly and efficiently identify weak links in a drainage system; and then budget affordable solutions. The methodology is founded on relationships that are universal.
“City of Surrey and District of North Vancouver case study experience has proven out the LOS screening methodology. The methodology saves time, effort and money,” reports Kim Stephens, Executive Director of the Partnership for Water Sustainability in BC.
“Now, local governments can focus on what is most important AND achieve more at less cost. They can quickly and inexpensively assess drainage system performance to pinpoint any problem areas. This will help them establish capital budget priorities for detailed analysis during the design process.”
District of North Vancouver Case Study
“The District of North Vancouver has applied the screening tool to evaluate drainage infrastructure in the Hastings Creek watershed,” adds Richard Boase, the District’s Environmental Protection Officer. He is also Co-Chair of the Water Balance Model Partnership.
”The District’s new Official Community Plan designates new growth around the urban town centre in Lynn Valley. Because we did not have the time or resources to evaluate the entire pipe network, the screening tool allowed us to undertake a basic assessment of the drainage network and highlight areas where capacity will require further study in advance of redevelopment and densification.”
The Methodology Behind the Tool
“The screening tool examines the pipe system that is tributary to a drainage outlet or outfall. Assessing catchments one-by-one keeps the analysis logical, simple and manageable,” continues Jim Dumont, Engineering Applications Authority for the Water Balance Model Partnership.
“Every pipe within each catchment is evaluated by examining the INSTALLED PIPE CAPACITY. Based on detailed modelling experience, we know that ‘problems’ fall within a narrow range. The lesson learned is that one need not model every section of pipe. This is why the screening tool compares installed pipe capacity to design discharge.”
“The Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool applies these lessons learned to establish priorities and make decisions. The Level-of-Service approach is inexpensive and provides relevant information for capital planning. It does this without the detailed and expensive simulation of the drainage system. The process establishes existing system capacity and then identifies those parts that do not meet this standard. These can be prioritized and entered into a capital plan.”
“By applying the Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool, it is now quite easy for local governments to check and verify the relative impact of a changing climate on conveyance capacity. The resilience of a system depends on the capacity a system has now and how drastic future climate change might be. The tool also makes it is easy to assess the relative significance of changes in land use, in particular densification. Local governments can now consider both climate change and land use change at the same time, and with the same tool,” concludes Jim Dumont.
To Try the Screening Tool
“Local government partners and consultants who are paid subscribers have access to this capability. To test-drive the Screening Tool, however, other local governments and/or infrastructure consultants can submit a request to firstname.lastname@example.org for a 30-day Trial Account that has full access,” states Ted van der Gulik, Chair of the Water Balance Model Partnership.
To Learn More:
An article about the tool was published in the Spring 2012 issue of the Asset Management BC Newsletter. To download the newsletter, click on the following link and scroll down to page 2 to read Your Assets? – Drainage Infrastructure Screening Tool Saves Money!